so while i have the day off from kids, i decided that i should do what my favorite thing used be: laying in bed, eating candy while watching movies (and chatting with my future husband, but even though i'd love to do that,
someone has to watch the kids). ok, in all honesty, my plan was to put on a movie that wouldn't really interest me and take a nap. so i went through my netflix to find something that wouldn't interest me or something that i had already seen so i wouldn't care. i came across the 1998 katie holmes teen horror- disturbing behavior. i started watching it and instead of napping, i got engaged in it again.
when i first watched it back in the 90's, i vividly remember loving it. i used to have a borderline sick love for movies where i would watch them, love them, then try to make my life recreate that movie. i mean, not entirely. but you know.... a little bit. so i remember falling for this movie and listening to flagpole sitta every other minute, trying to pull off tank tops that bared my stomach and trying so desperately to make "razor" happen. it didn't. rightfully so. but watching it now, although i completely enjoyed it, i totally didn't connect to it. maybe because i'm no longer a weird teen who feels misunderstood and left out? idk.
first off, all i could think was how this movie was so much like stepford wives. many people say the faculty is the movie it models and i can see that. and i did think that for a minute but since there's no alien presence, just mind control, stepford wives was the movie winner that i compared it to.
secondly, what is up with every 90's teen flick doing the lunch room clique breakdown? lol. ok maybe it's not just the 90's. i remember that scene in mean girls too. but i thought it was funny how this guy just comes up to the new kid and gives him the rundown on everyone in the school. and of course it took all of lunch for the 2 minutes conversation to happen.

but here's my big issue, and many people have this complaint: this movie could've been stellar if it had real development. it takes a very long time to find out that steve's brother is dead and how he died. is there a reason that held secret until the end? why is rachel the trash of the town? they don't talk about her family or what got her there. she just is but she seems like a completely normal teen and despite all that sass, she seems somewhat lovely. (i don't know what makes her seem lovely to me besides the fact that i just think of her as joey potter gone rock n roll. but like a tame rock n roll). i really wish we got to see more of gavin and his background. yeah, as a teen when i watched it, it was a total shock to see him go blue ribbon. but watching as an adult, i was just like... i'm supposed to care why? i didn't even know he had parents that cared! i assume rachel doesn't.
gratuitous tit shot.
why are there never gratuitous peen shots? :(
the beginning where gavin witnesses the murder should've been left out. instead, they should've introduced us to caldicott. what he was trying to do seemed interesting. i get he's an science obsessed sociopath, but what made him go from father to experimenting on his daughter? what was she like before? i mean, i guess they wanted that as the big reveal to save for later in the film, but i think at that point, that's when you should show us some of THAT storyline. i wanna know what his first batch of mind controllers were like. you wouldn't have to even go that far in, just a semi quick recap of flashbacks. overall, we just don't get to know the characters. even the main one, steve. and the ending is really dumb and slightly confusing to me. like the writers just stopped and hit "auto ending" and then "twist ending". there was a slight sexual tension between rachel and steven but they really didn't tell that story enough for me to find them being a couple believable. it just felt out of nowhere. personally, i thought, well it's obvious he likes her but she must not like him so whatever. sometimes i wasn't even sure if she liked him as a person but now they're kissing and in love? ok..... it's nice that they included the sister but she was so nonexistent in the movie, i don't think i would've thought twice if steve left her. and what about their parents? how are they going to feel about this now that blue ribbons isn't a factor? and how are they the only 4 teens left in the bay when there was an entire school of kids and only like 20 of them were brainwashed? and who's going to explain to the parents of dead teens what happened to their kids? where the fuck are steve, his sister, rachel and uv going to go? that's real cute that "home is wherever we are" but you're teens! and you have a kid sister! you have to eat, you need money. are you becoming homeless? how the hell is that going to work for you? especially when you can just as easily go home without any problems now.
then the big twist is that gavin survived and is still brainwashed. which is a cool twist. but i'm like what's the point of telling me that? does that mean everyone survived? maybe just a few? did the doctor survive? just gavin? because gavin didn't do the operations so him surviving means exactly jack shit to me besides the fact that 12 year old michelle had a huge crush on him and was glad he was still around to be sexy. that was a twist just to have a twist!
overall the movie is good, it's an interesting story which is why it's done over and over in various ways. the acting is eh and it could definitely use some more development. but i liked it and got along fine without it, just would've liked it more and it would've made more sense with it. it was nice to watch again though.